Impact of dietary Rhus coriaria (Sumac) powder supplementation on meat quality, serum minerals, and intestinal histomorphology in Cobb-500 broiler chickens
Rhus coriaria powder supplementation in broiler chicken
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62310/liab.v6i1.421Keywords:
Broiler chicken, Cobb-500, Intestinal histomorphology, Lipid oxidation, Rhus coriaria, SumacAbstract
Phytogenic feed additives are increasingly explored as antibiotic-free strategies to support broiler productivity, meat quality, and gut health. Rhus coriaria L. (sumac) is a polyphenol-rich spice with reported antioxidant, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity, but the dose-dependent effects on carcass meat quality, serum macro-minerals and intestinal architecture in modern broilers remain incompletely characterized. This study evaluated the effect of graded dietary levels of sumac powder on breast and thigh meat quality, serum calcium and phosphorus, and duodenal and jejunal histomorphology of Cobb-500 broilers. Three hundred one-day-old Cobb-500 broiler chicks were assigned to five dietary treatments (0, 1, 2, 3 or 4 g sumac/kg feed; 60 birds per treatment, distributed among four pens of 15 birds each) for 35 days, and outcomes were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Meat-quality and serum parameters were assessed in three birds/treatment and histomorphological outcomes in five birds/treatment, with the individual bird as the experimental unit. Sumac did not affect breast-meat water-holding capacity, drip loss, cooking loss, pH or sensory scores (P > 0.05). Thigh cooking loss decreased from 26.4% in controls to 5.7% at 4 g/kg (P = 0.001), and breast-meat lipid oxidation (thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances) tended to be lowest at 1 g/kg (0.31 vs 0.41 mg malondialdehyde/kg in controls; P = 0.058). Serum phosphorus was highest at 2 g/kg (6.20 mg/dL; P = 0.021); calcium was unaffected (P = 0.325). In both the duodenum and jejunum, villus length, villus width, villus: crypt ratio and estimated villus surface-area index were significantly greater, and crypt depth significantly smaller, at 1–2 g/kg than in controls or at 3–4 g/kg (P < 0.001 for all); tunica muscularis thickness was unaffected. Dietary sumac powder produced outcome-specific responses in Cobb-500 broilers: thigh-meat cooking loss decreased progressively with increasing inclusion, with the greatest reduction at 4 g/kg; serum phosphorus concentration was highest at 2 g/kg; and duodenal and jejunal villus architecture was most favorably altered at 1–2 g/kg, with no further improvement at 3–4 g/kg. These findings suggest that 1–2 g/kg sumac may represent a suitable inclusion level for altering selected histomorphometric indices of intestinal architecture, whereas higher inclusion (up to 4 g/kg) may be preferable when improved cooking yield is the primary objective; however, the small per-treatment sample sizes for meat and serum traits (three birds/treatment) and the absence of a pre-specified sample-size calculation mean these findings should be confirmed in an adequately powered, independently replicated trial.
Metrics
References
Abd El-Hack ME, Alagawany M, Salah AS, Abdel-Latif MA, Farghly MF. (2018). Effects of dietary supplementation of zinc oxide and zinc methionine on layer performance, egg quality, and blood serum indices. Biological Trace Element Research 184(2): 456–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-017-1190-0
Abd El-Hack ME, El-Saadony MT, Salem HM, El-Tahan AM, Soliman MM, Youssef GBA, Taha AE, Soliman SM, Ahmed AE, El-Kott AF. (2022). Alternatives to antibiotics for organic poultry production: types, modes of action and impacts on bird's health and production. Poultry Science 101(4): 101696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101696
Abu-Reidah IM, Ali-Shtayeh MS, Jamous RM, Arráez-Román D, Segura-Carretero A. (2015). HPLC–DAD–ESI-MS/MS screening of bioactive components from Rhus coriaria L. (sumac) fruits. Food Chemistry 166: 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.011
Ahmadian A, Seidavi A, Phillips CJC. (2020). Growth, carcass composition, haematology and immunity of broilers supplemented with sumac berries (Rhus coriaria L.) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris). Animals 10(3): 513. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030513
Alagawany M, Elnesr SS, Farag MR, Abd El-Hack ME, Khafaga AF, Taha AE, Tiwari R, Yatoo MI, Bhatt P, Marappan G, Dhama K. (2019). Use of licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) herb as a feed additive in poultry: current knowledge and prospects. Animals 9(8): 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080536
Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J. (2012). World agriculture towards 2030/2050: The 2012 revision. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. https://www.fao.org/3/ap106e/ap106e.pdf
Alsamri H, Athamneh K, Pintus G, Eid AH, Iratni R. (2021). Pharmacological and antioxidant activities of Rhus coriaria L. (sumac). Antioxidants 10(1): 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10010073
AOAC International (2007). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed., current through Rev. 2. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International.
Radha Krishnan K, Babuskin S, Babu PAS, Sasikala M, Sabina K, Archana G, Sivarajan M, Sukumar M. (2014). Antimicrobial and antioxidant effects of spice extracts on the shelf life extension of raw chicken meat. International Journal of Food Microbiology 171: 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.11.011
Batiha GE-S, Ogunyemi OM, Shaheen HM, Kutu FR, Olaiya CO, Sabatier J-M, De Waard M. (2022). Rhus coriaria L. (sumac), a versatile and resourceful food spice with cornucopia of polyphenols. Molecules 27(16): 5179. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165179
Biesek J, Kuźniacka J, Banaszak M, Adamski M. (2020). The quality of carcass and meat from geese fed diets with or without soybean meal. Animals 10(2): 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020200
Cason J, Lyon CE, Papa CM. (1997). Effect of muscle opposition during rigor on development of broiler breast meat tenderness. Poultry Science 76(5): 785–787. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.5.785
Cobb-Vantress. (2022). Cobb500 broiler performance & nutrition supplement. Cobb-Vantress, Inc., Siloam Springs, Arkansas, USA.
National Research Council (1994). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry: Ninth Revised Edition, 1994. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press.
Diaz-Sanchez S, D'Souza D, Biswas D, Hanning I. (2015). Botanical alternatives to antibiotics for use in organic poultry production. Poultry Science 94(6): 1419–1430. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev014
Dirinck P, De Winne A, Casteels M, Frigg M. (1996). Studies on vitamin E and meat quality. 1. Effect of feeding high vitamin E levels on time-related pork quality. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 44(1): 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf940607x
Elmeligy AA, Ghania AA, Fotouh A. (2024). Pathological and immunohistochemical studies of lymphoid leukosis in pigeons in Egypt. Open Veterinary Journal 14(8): 1952. https://doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i8.24
Golzadeh M, Farhoomand P, Daneshyar M. (2012). Dietary Rhus coriaria L. powder reduces the blood cholesterol, VLDL-c and glucose, but increases abdominal fat in broilers. South African Journal of Animal Science 42(4): 398–405. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v42i4.8
Honikel KO, Kim CJ. (1986). Causes of the development of PSE pork. Fleischwirtschaft 66(3): 349–353.
Huang Q, Liu X, Zhao G, Hu T, Wang Y. (2018). Potential and challenges of tannins as an alternative to in-feed antibiotics for farm animal production. Animal Nutrition 4(2): 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.09.004
Jehan IA, Asmaa EH. (2025). Impact assessment of some mineral feed additives on Oreochromis niloticus with special reference to potential effect on the immunological status and fish tissue quality. Egyptian Journal of Animal Health 5(3): 141–155. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejah.2025.456919
Kheiri F, Rahimian Y, Nasr J. (2015). Application of sumac and dried whey in female broiler feed. Archives of Animal Breeding 58(1): 205–210. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-58-205-2015
Lin H, Zhao S, Han X, Guan W, Liu B, Chen A, Sun Y, Wang J. (2022). Effect of static magnetic field extended supercooling preservation on beef quality. Food Chemistry 370: 131264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131264
Mahmoud MA-A, Abdel-Kareem AH, Abdel-Hafez MS, Fotouh A, Zahran IS, Abdel-Rahman HA-R. (2025). Nanoparticles amelioration effects on heat stress in broilers. Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal 71(185): 314–343. https://doi.org/10.21608/avmj.2025.343118.1515
Mansoub NH. (2011). Effect of different levels of sumac powder (Rhus coriaria L.) on performance, carcass and blood parameters of broiler chickens. Annals of Biological Research 2(5): 647–652.
Matthaus B, Özcan MM. (2014). Fatty acid, tocopherol and squalene contents of Rosaceae seed oils. Botanical Studies 55(1): 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-014-0048-4
Mellen M, Pavelková A, Haščík P, Bobko M, Čuboň J. (2014). Sensory evaluation of Cobb 500 chicken meat after application of different additives in their nutrition. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences 8(1): 184–189. https://doi.org/10.5219/373
Mottet A, Tempio G. (2017). Global poultry production: current state and future outlook and challenges. World's Poultry Science Journal 73(2): 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917000071
Northcutt JK, Foegeding EA, Edens FW. (1994). Water-holding properties of thermally preconditioned chicken breast and leg meat. Poultry Science 73(2): 308–316. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0730308
Reda FM, Alagawany M, Alsolami AM, Mahmoud HK, Salah AS, Momenah MA, Alshahrani MY, El-Tarabily KA, Saleh RM. (2024). The incorporation of sumac seed powder (Rhus coriaria L.) into the diet of quail breeders as a novel feed additive. Poultry Science 103(5): 103593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.103593
Reda FM, Alawam AS, Mahmoud HK, El-Saadony MT, Salah AS, Rudayni HA, Allam AA, El-Naggar K, Alagawany M, Khairunnesa M. (2025). Application of green cobalt nanoparticles in the diet of broiler chickens to improve sustainable production and health. Veterinary Medicine and Science 11(4): e70508. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70508
Reda FM, Mahmoud HK, Youssef IM, Khan MM, Algahdali EH, Alharbi HM, Alwutayd KM, Abd El-Hack ME, Mohamed RS, El-Mekkawy MM. (2026). Effects of dietary Rhus coriaria L. powder on growth performance, antioxidant status, and immune competence of broiler chickens under high-density rearing conditions. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 35(2): 100674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2026.100674
Sakhr K, El Khatib S. (2020). Physiochemical properties and medicinal, nutritional and industrial applications of Lebanese sumac (Syrian sumac – Rhus coriaria): a review. Heliyon 6(1): e03207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03207
Yang C, Chowdhury MK, Hou Y, Gong J. (2015). Phytogenic compounds as alternatives to in-feed antibiotics: potentials and challenges in application. Pathogens 4(1): 137–156. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens4010137
Yitbarek MB, Tamir B, Mengistu A. (2016). The effect of dried blood rumen content mixture (D BRCM) on carcass characteristics of SASSO C44 broiler chicks. European Scientific Journal 12(12): 166. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n12p166
Zannou O, Kouame Fulbert O, Chabi I, Alamou F, Awad N, Miassi Y, Loké F, Abdoulaye A, Pashazadeh H, Ali Redha A, Kpoclou YE, Guclu G, Koca I, Selli S, Ibrahim S. (2024). Phytochemical and nutritional properties of sumac (Rhus coriaria): a potential ingredient for developing functional foods. Journal of Future Foods 5: 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfutfo.2024.01.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wafi Al-Antaif, Mohamed Marzok, Mohamed El-Sherif, Mohammed Al-Rasheed, Mahmoud Mohamed, Mohamed Ahmed, Adel Almubarak, Nouran Ali, Hala Amer, Abeer Hassan, Ahmed Fotouh, Ayman Salah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2026-09-05
Published 2026-09-10